`name` option in `logseq.Editor.upsertProperty` not working
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 28
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
### Search first
- [x] I searched and no similar issues were found
### What Happened?
I wrote a plugin and create some properties via `logseq.Editor.upsertProperty` method:
```js
const properties = {
key: { schema: { type: 'default' }, opts: { name: "Jira Key" } },
url: { schema: { type: 'url' }, opts: { name: "Jira URL" } },
type: { schema: { type: 'default' }, opts: { name: "Jira Issue Type" } },
[...]
}
for (const [key, meta] of Object.entries(properties)) {
await logseq.Editor.upsertProperty(key, meta.schema, meta.opts)
}
```
The properties are created, but the name is ignored and the key is used as name.
The not working feature is described here: https://github.com/logseq/logseq/blob/master/libs/guides/db_properties_references.md#upsertpropertyname-schema-opts
### Reproduce the Bug
1. create a simple plugin
2. call: `await logseq.Editor.upsertProperty("my_test", { schema: { type: 'default' }, [meta.opts](opts: { name: "My Test" }))`
3. check created property
### Expected Behavior
Created property should use the name as display name.
### Screenshots
_No response_
### Files
_No response_
### Browser, Desktop or Mobile Platform Information
_No response_
### Additional Context
_No response_
### Are you willing to submit a PR? If you know how to fix the bug.
- [ ] I'm willing to submit a PR (Thank you!)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the documented upsertProperty(name, schema, opts) reference and trace the logseq.Editor.upsertProperty implementation. Reproduce the call using opts.name, then verify that the created property uses the supplied value as its display name rather than the key.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- api, database
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100