localstack / localstack/verdin
Consider archiving verdin
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 23
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
With the release of Tinybird's own Python SDK tinybirdco/tinybird-sdk-python, we can now consider archiving verdin 🥳
Most things that verdin provided were API wrappers, which are now covered by the tinybird-python-sdk.
The only thing to consider as something that may add value is the worker concept. So verdin could become a re-usable higher-level layer on top of the tinybird sdk.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Compare verdin's existing API-wrapper scope with the tinybird-sdk-python linked in the issue. Read verdin/worker.py to assess whether the worker concept is a reusable higher-level layer. Done means reaching a clear decision to archive verdin or retain and reshape it around workers.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- api, backend
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100