Umap behaviour is sklearn pipeline
Open
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 8.3k
- Forks
- 871
- Avg merge
- 1d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
Does adding umap in a sklearn pipeline which is finally called e.g. using `pipeline.fit(X,y)` produce a map in an unsupervised or in a supervised way? Is there a way to control for that? Thanks
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reviewing UMAP's scikit-learn transformer documentation and the behavior of sklearn.pipeline when fit receives y. Determine whether pipeline.fit(X, y) selects supervised or unsupervised behavior and how that choice can be controlled; done when the behavior and control mechanism are clearly documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- scikit-learn
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100