[X86] Remove matchPMADDWD
Open
backend:X86
code-cleanup
- Dominant language
- LLVM
- Stars
- 40.5k
- Forks
- 18.7k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Similar to #223368 - the middle-end should mostly be handling this now. Ensuring we have suitable test coverage in PhaseOrdering and backend coverage should just need to match those results.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reading the related issue #223368 and the existing PhaseOrdering coverage. Check how matchPMADDWD is handled by the middle-end, then compare the backend behavior against those results. Done means suitable PhaseOrdering tests and matching backend coverage are in place.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100