[GitHub] which label should be used for trunk-only regression issues?
- Dominant language
- LLVM
- Stars
- 40.5k
- Forks
- 18.7k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
> @Andarwinux why did you tag this with regression24? we are still in the 24.x cycle and the tag is supposed to reflect regressions after branch
_Originally posted by @RKSimon in [#215069](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/215069#issuecomment-5341547352)_
As a triager, which label should I add to trunk-only regression issues? Should it be `regression:24`, or `regression`, or just nothing? Could someone clarify what's the correct approach?
cc @EugeneZelenko
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the quoted discussion from issue #215069 and compare the three possibilities named here: regression:24, regression, or no label. The issue is done when maintainers confirm the correct label policy for trunk-only regression issues.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100