[clang-tidy] Add a check to replace boolean search idioms with `std::ranges::contains` / `std::ranges::contains_subrange`

clang-tidy already has checks that modernize iterator-based algorithm calls into ranges-based ones, but it would still be useful to have a check for the next step up: canonical boolean search idioms that are really spelling `std::ranges::contains` or `std::ranges::contains_subrange`.

Today code like this is common:

```cpp
auto found = std::find(v.begin(), v.end(), x) != v.end();
```

or:

```cpp
if (std::ranges::find(r, x) != std::ranges::end(r)) {
...
}
```

and substring/subrange tests are often written as:

```cpp
auto has_sub = std::search(r.begin(), r.end(), sub.begin(), sub.end()) != r.end();
```

In C++23 the intent can be expressed more directly as:

```cpp
auto found = std::ranges::contains(v, x);
```

and:

```cpp
auto has_sub = std::ranges::contains_subrange(r, sub);
```

These spellings are shorter and clearer, and they make the boolean nature of the test explicit rather than encoding it indirectly through comparison against an end iterator.