[LLDB] Swig python extensions are missing test coverage
- Dominant language
- LLVM
- Stars
- 40.5k
- Forks
- 18.7k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
@jimingham pointed out on #168619 that a lot of the lldb extensions are either not tested or don't have direct testing. I've opened this issue as a good new user issue.
The largest offenders are
- [x] [SBFrameExtensions](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ccdb71932aa84a36f3d9689eca97b80bf643c500/lldb/bindings/interface/SBFrameExtensions.i#L4)
- [x] [SBTargetExtensions](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ccdb71932aa84a36f3d9689eca97b80bf643c500/lldb/bindings/interface/SBThreadExtensions.i)
- [ ] [SBProcessExtensions](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ccdb71932aa84a36f3d9689eca97b80bf643c500/lldb/bindings/interface/SBProcessExtensions.i)
While target and valueobject actually have more properties, a quick grep showed a lot of these are exercised in existing tests.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.