[LLVM][MIPS] Sibling calls push/pop stack

At present, tail call optimizations do not work at all with or without the `mips-tail-calls` flag being set. This is related to and dependent upon, but distinct from, #161193.

This issue is being reported with PR #161860 by @djtodoro, as it makes tail calls functional at all in MIPS.

With said PR, sibling calls are not being optimized - the jump-link instructions is being pushed to the end and replaced with a jump and the jump-return removed, but the stack is still being set-up and torn-down.

```c++
__attribute__((noinline))
int foo0()
{
volatile int a;
return a += 1;
}

int bar0()
{
return foo0();
}
```

with tail calls disabled (`-std=gnu++23 -O3 -march=mips32r6 -fno-PIC -mllvm -mips-tail-calls=0`):

```asm
addiu $sp, $sp, -24
sw $ra, 20($sp) # 4-byte Folded Spill
sw $fp, 16($sp) # 4-byte Folded Spill
move $fp, $sp
jal _Z4foo0v
nop
move $sp, $fp
lw $fp, 16($sp) # 4-byte Folded Reload
lw $ra, 20($sp) # 4-byte Folded Reload
addiu $sp, $sp, 24
jrc $ra
```

with tail calls enabled (`-std=gnu++23 -O3 -march=mips32r6 -fno-PIC -mllvm -mips-tail-calls=1`):

```asm
addiu $sp, $sp, -8
sw $ra, 4($sp) # 4-byte Folded Spill
sw $fp, 0($sp) # 4-byte Folded Spill
move $fp, $sp
move $sp, $fp
lw $fp, 0($sp) # 4-byte Folded Reload
lw $ra, 4($sp) # 4-byte Folded Reload
j _Z4foo0v
addiu $sp, $sp, 8
```

What is expected:

```asm
j _Z4foo0v
nop
```

or

```asm
bc _Z4foo0v
```

So, it's moving the `j` to the end, but it's not cleaning up the stack changes that were _around_ the jump. Everything in here but the `j` could be removed (with a `nop`, but the `j` should be replaced with a `bc` anyways, see #165634), but this effectively is generating a rather messed up function.

A significant amount of logic for handling this issue is present in `LowerCall` for PPC and for AArch64 (and the rest), but is missing in the MIPS version.