llnl / llnl/smith

Review whether we should pass command line arguments to Petsc

Open
#1,461 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
C++
Stars
245
Forks
36
Avg merge
8d 23h
Merged PRs (30d)
4

Description

#1460

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reading issue #1460, which is the only context linked from this issue. Determine whether passing command-line arguments to PETSc is needed and document the resulting decision; the issue provides no files, tests, or entry points.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
cpp
Domain
hpc
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
15/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.