ISO C99 and later do not support implicit int
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 112
- Forks
- 35
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi,
I am trying to build mpiP using "icx" on intel CPUs, but met the following issue. how to fix it?
pc_lookup.c:115:41: error: parameter 'data' was not declared, defaults to 'int'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit int [-Wimplicit-int]
find_address_in_section (abfd, section, data)
^
pc_lookup.c:118:6: error: expected function body after function declarator
PTR data;
^
pc_lookup.c:119:1: error: expected identifier or '('
{
^
pc_lookup.c:438:58: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PTR'
bfd_map_over_sections (abfd, find_address_in_section, (PTR) NULL);
^
pc_lookup.c:438:32: error: use of undeclared identifier 'find_address_in_section'
bfd_map_over_sections (abfd, find_address_in_section, (PTR) NULL);
^
pc_lookup.c:480:35: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PTR'
(PTR) NULL);
^
pc_lookup.c:479:44: error: use of undeclared identifier 'find_address_in_section'
bfd_map_over_sections (fso->bfd, find_address_in_section,
^
7 errors generated.
make: *** [Rules.mak:6: pc_lookup.o] Error 1
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Reproduce the failure with icx and inspect pc_lookup.c around lines 115-119, then trace the PTR references near lines 438 and 479-480. The change is complete when mpiP builds successfully with the reported compiler errors resolved.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- c
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100