llnl / llnl/magpie

Re-visit estimates on thread counts, process limits, file descriptor limits, etc.

Open
#233 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Shell
Stars
198
Forks
51
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Newer systems may have hyper threading on and core counts are now much larger than before. Estimates for the number of threads daemons should have to handle communications (for example NameNode, DataNode, etc.) were previously estimates based on node count. These estimates may now be out of date and need to be calculated differently. Revisit calculations for these estimates.

In addition, max number of tasks (such as in Hadoop or Spark) may also need to be re-estimated. While in the past it may have been common to have 8-24 cores, with hyper threading 48-64 is not that unreasonable. The trade off of more threads/tasks may no longer be balanced in favor of big data applications. Re-consider how max threads/tasks per node is determined.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Locate the scripts or entry points that calculate daemon thread counts, task limits, and file descriptor limits, then trace the assumptions based on node and core counts. Compare those calculations with the Hadoop and Spark use cases described in the issue. Done means the estimates and per-node limits have been reconsidered for larger and hyper-threaded systems, with the affected behavior validated.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
hadoop, shell, spark
Domain
data-engineering, hpc, performance
Issue type
Refactor
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.