Re-visit estimates on thread counts, process limits, file descriptor limits, etc.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 198
- Forks
- 51
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Newer systems may have hyper threading on and core counts are now much larger than before. Estimates for the number of threads daemons should have to handle communications (for example NameNode, DataNode, etc.) were previously estimates based on node count. These estimates may now be out of date and need to be calculated differently. Revisit calculations for these estimates.
In addition, max number of tasks (such as in Hadoop or Spark) may also need to be re-estimated. While in the past it may have been common to have 8-24 cores, with hyper threading 48-64 is not that unreasonable. The trade off of more threads/tasks may no longer be balanced in favor of big data applications. Re-consider how max threads/tasks per node is determined.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Locate the scripts or entry points that calculate daemon thread counts, task limits, and file descriptor limits, then trace the assumptions based on node and core counts. Compare those calculations with the Hadoop and Spark use cases described in the issue. Done means the estimates and per-node limits have been reconsidered for larger and hyper-threaded systems, with the affected behavior validated.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- hadoop, shell, spark
- Domain
- data-engineering, hpc, performance
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100