llnl / llnl/blt

check to defend against bad linker flags?

Open
#610 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
C++
Stars
296
Forks
66
Avg merge
1h 3m
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

observation:

If you add `CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS` and have a typo (e.g: misspell a lib name), this will cause failures downstream when you get to BLT-builtin TPL support. In my case, finding MPI failed and there was no output that would signal it is related the lib flags, just "I can't find MPI!"

Since these flags are used everywhere, a compile check that uses these flags early could detect an issue and allow us to provide a better error message.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start by tracing where CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS are applied and where BLT-builtin TPL support performs MPI detection. Run the existing configuration or MPI checks with an intentionally invalid linker flag to reproduce the silent failure. Done means an early compile check reports the linker-flag problem distinctly before downstream MPI detection fails.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
cmake
Domain
build-system, hpc, testing
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.