Can pytorch version 3dcnn reproduce the results of paper?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 92
- Forks
- 31
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
When I tried the 3dcnn pytorch version, can't reproduce the perasonr mentioned in the paper. The training performance on refine_minus_core set is 0.95(pearsonr), the test performance on core set is 0.59(pearsonr). Any suggestions?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start from the PyTorch 3dcnn version and compare its training on the refine_minus_core set and testing on the core set with the paper's reported Pearson correlations. No files or tests are named; done means identifying the source of the discrepancy or documenting why the reported results cannot be reproduced.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python, pytorch
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100