lllyasviel / lllyasviel/ControlNet
About Eq(5) in paper
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 34.1k
- Forks
- 3k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi,
I have a question about eq(5) in paper,
$$\mathcal{Z}(I;{W, B})_{p, i} = B_i + \sum_j^c I_{p,i}W_{i,j}$$
why not
$$\mathcal{Z}(I;{W, B})_{p, i} = B_i + \sum_j^c I_{\textcolor{red}{p,j}}W_{i,j}$$
the output of $\mathcal{Z}_{p, i}$ is producted by the i-th 1*1 conv kernel params $W_i$ and $B_i$, with the input of $I_p$?
have I missed something?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with Eq. (5) in the referenced paper and compare its index notation with the surrounding definitions of I, W, and B. Done means resolving whether the displayed index is a typo or explaining why the stated summation is correct in the paper's notation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100