litespeedtech / litespeedtech/openlitespeed
enhancement ? ASGI to LSAPI ??
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 1.5k
- Forks
- 233
- Avg merge
- 2d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
Hi,
Just a suggestion.
I know there is a way to launch **WSGI** python app, but a lot of python programs will now using **ASGI**. This is the case for **_FastAPI_** for exemple. For now the only way to use it i found was with a python server like unicorne and use reverse proxy.
It will be great if we could use directly **_FastAPI_** the way is supposed to be... **_Django_**, **_Redis_**, **_Quart_** ( Flask like but async ) are now **ASGI** compatible too, and it's juste a start...
Thanks for your work and to share with us an OpenSource Version of your incredible server ;)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating the existing WSGI support and its configuration path, then determine what direct ASGI support would require; done would mean ASGI applications such as FastAPI can run without a separate server and reverse proxy.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- django, fastapi, flask, python
- Domain
- api, backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100