Call for consultation services communtiy can offer

Nobody has claimed this yet.

https://osresearch.net/Consultation-Services/ was written in 2024 per merged https://github.com/linuxboot/heads-wiki/pull/164 but i'm the only one there and nobody proposed a PR to offer other consultation services. CC @root-hardenedvault?

I welcome modifications there, after of course reviewing who those added people would be.

Alternative to
- https://github.com/linuxboot/heads/issues/2166
- https://github.com/linuxboot/heads/issues/2027

I am no king nor dictator here. If I cannot get funded properly, I need to be made redundant. Let's make this happen.
Also related

[2024 - QubesOS mini-summit - Jan Suhr & Thierry Laurion - Future of Measured Boot such as Heads (Design Session)
Abstract](https://youtu.be/ZPeidhgNBtg?list=PLuISieMwVBpL5S7kPUHKenoFj_YJ8Y0_d) Which was a plan to make Heads obsolete. 2 years later, it's not the case. Let's work torward that goal?

Conference AI summary:
> Jan Suhr (Nitrokey) leads a design discussion on Heads' measured-boot architecture: a coreboot + Linux-payload firmware using a USB security dongle as root of trust to mitigate evil-maid attacks, paired with Qubes OS on Nitropads. The central UX pain point: users must re-sign after every kernel update because Heads verifies exact hashes of /boot files. "If you compare it to ordinary PC users, this is in fact complicated — this is a burden," Suhr states, noting this blocks mainstream adoption. Alternative architectures debated: UKI (Unified Kernel Image) could solve the resigning problem by reducing changed files from five to one and enabling signature-based rather than hash-based verification. Porting Heads' logic to UEFI/TPM was discussed, but would require reimplementing all the bash-based measurement logic — "if funding is unlimited, everything's possible," Laurion quips. DRTM was considered but dismissed as server-only and requiring PCI-device reset. OpenPGP card support in UEFI was explored but deemed "quite expensive" (requiring Rust reimplementation). The group converged that making attested boot mainstream requires: kernel updates without manual resigning, richer user feedback on what changed in grub configuration, OS-side signing integration, and potentially UKI adoption.

CC @jans23: maybe its time to make a joint public talk to push your plan forward?

Start by reading the existing Consultation Services page at osresearch.net/Consultation-Services/ and the linked alternative issues; the payload names no repository file, test, or implementation entry point. Done would require a reviewed PR adding agreed, vetted consultation services and people to the page.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.