Consider using Forth rather than the pipeline
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 373
- Forks
- 59
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Right now, utk2 uses a pipeline like the following:
utk winterfell.rom \
remove 12345678-9abc-def0-1234-567890abcdef \
remove 23830293-3029-3823-0922-328328330939 \
replace_pe32 Shell linux.efi \
save winterfell2.rom
We might be able to have more flexibility with a forth-like interface:
utk winterfell.rom \
find 12345678-9abc-def0-1234-567890abcdef remove \
find 23830293-3029-3823-0922-328328330939 remove \
find Shell replace_pe32 linux.efi \
save winterfell2.rom
This suggestion comes from @rminnich
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the utk2 command-line pipeline implementation and its handling of the shown find, remove, replace_pe32, and save commands. Compare the current interface with the proposed Forth-like form, then establish the desired syntax and scope; completion would require an agreed design and corresponding implementation or documentation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- cli
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100