Would it be possible to pass a sub-tree as parameter to a partial?

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Apologies if this has been previously discussed or is simply unpractical to implement, but I wish there as a way to pass a sub-tree of DOM elements to a partial as a parameter.

_Example:_

```

{>"components/my-component1" parameter1="foobar"}

{<}
```

```

```

_Result:_

```

```

This would allow developers to create self-contained and reusable components as Dust.js partials. You can argue that this is technically possible now, but one would have to pass any markup required by the component as a normal parameter, which can get messy very easily:

```
{>"components/my-component1" parameter1="foobar" content="

"}
```

A similar approached is used by Sass in their mixins, as developers can define normal parameters as well a special code block defined as `@content`.

``` scss
@mixin component1($arg1, $arg) {
.component1 {
width: $arg1;
height: $arg2;
@content;
}
}
```

React components also make this possible through `this.props.children`.

I'd love to hear your thoughts about this. Thanks in advance!

Start by reviewing how Dust.js currently handles partial parameters and nested markup, then compare that behavior with the requested call-site and partial examples. Done would mean agreeing on a supported syntax and behavior for passing the nested subtree while preserving existing partial usage.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.