Layer names missing in summary
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 352
- Forks
- 38
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I see this line in AbstractNeuralNetwork.uniqueLayerNames (line 534)
```
String baseName = layer.internalAPI().hasName() ? layer.getClass().getSimpleName() : layer.getName();
```
This make no sense to me. Should it be the other way round?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at AbstractNeuralNetwork.uniqueLayerNames around line 534 and inspect how hasName(), getName(), and the generated summary use layer names. Confirm which branch produces the missing names, then verify that summaries show the intended layer names and run the relevant project tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100