linkedin / linkedin/css-blocks
Fall back to synchronous preprocessors
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 6.3k
- Forks
- 154
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
If a syntax is missing in preprocessors but is present in preprocessorsSync, we should fall back to using the synchronous implementation instead of erroring out.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the code that selects a syntax from preprocessors and preprocessorsSync. Verify the missing-syntax path and make the synchronous implementation the fallback, then confirm that the original error is avoided and existing preprocessor behavior remains unchanged.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- frontend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100