Improve our code coverage numbers
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 87
- Forks
- 73
- Avg merge
- 2h 50m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
1. Identify if our code coverage numbers are accurate.
2. Improve the code coverage accuracy (don't count `/tests` and `/generated` code
3. Create issues for where we need to improve code coverage the most
A good starting point: https://app.codecov.io/gh/linkedin/avro-util
Example: why are we counting `helper/tests`?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Codecov project for linkedin/avro-util and inspect why helper/tests is included in the reported coverage. Verify whether tests and generated code are counted, then adjust the coverage configuration so the reported numbers are accurate. Document the largest remaining coverage gaps as follow-up issues.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- testing
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100