Please use my `IntegerOrFloat`. I added a `Negative` for you
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 61
- Forks
- 16
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
https://github.com/MFEK/integer_or_float.rlib
Please, instead of your own. It's making merging our implementations more challenging than it needs be. I think it's obvious my implementation is far more complete, but if you want clarification on any point I'm happy to oblige.
As stated in title, I added a `Negative` for you:
https://github.com/MFEK/integer_or_float.rlib/blob/22862f7072821e22b404f9a46de34e6ad991f627/src/lib.rs#L23-L29
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by comparing norad's current IntegerOrFloat implementation with the linked MFEK/integer_or_float.rlib repository, especially src/lib.rs and the referenced Negative definition. Determine where norad's implementation is used and whether the external implementation can replace it without changing behavior. Done means the implementations are merged consistently and the added Negative support is included.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100