Inconsistency: PeerRecord vs RoutingState
Open
@Stebalien is already working on this.
Since Mar 15, 2021.
question
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 1.8k
- Forks
- 320
- Avg merge
- 11d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
specs/RFC/0003-routing-records.md has PeerRecord in the protobuf it defines, but RoutingState elsewhere. It's only by examining the history https://github.com/libp2p/specs/commit/377f05abe37fca3bfe392b5e07c134da94306c02 that it becomes apparent that they're meant to be the same thing.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.