libigl / libigl/libigl-python-bindings
libigl python binding tutorials severely out of date
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 371
- Forks
- 84
- Avg merge
- 19h 36m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Description
I wonder if the tutorials should be maintained. They're very out of date and were mostly direct translations of the C++ tutorial anyway. I think the documentation dictionary could be populated automatically from nanobind generated type/doc information.
If no one volunteers to maintain them, my inclination is to retire them.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read the existing Python binding tutorials and compare them with the C++ tutorial to identify outdated material. Then review the nanobind-generated type and documentation information mentioned in the issue. Completion depends on deciding whether the tutorials should be maintained, supported by generated documentation, or retired.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp, python
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100