thoughts on boilerplate & generate design
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 15
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
currently download from github export master zip
Planning to switch to npm pkg because:
- version control
- generate tasks integration
but npm download slowly, try to direct download the tar pkg
common generate tasks (add mock) provided by fe module and others within boilerplates:
- boilerplate directory structure:
package.json
meta.js
index.js
boilerplate/
generate/
index.jsincludes tasks scripts:
export default {
'generate:component': env => {
copy('folder', 'project/src')
},
'build:XXX': () => {
}
};
- export tasks in
packge.jsonway
{
"main": "index.js"
}
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the proposed package.json, meta.js, index.js, boilerplate/, and generate/ layout, starting with the current GitHub master-zip download flow. Compare the npm package and direct tar download options, then define how tasks such as generate:component and build:XXX should be exported; done requires an agreed design and implementation scope.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript, node.js
- Domain
- build-system, tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100