learningequality / learningequality/le-utils

Reinstitute common embed definitions

Open
#173 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

P2 - normal
Dominant language
Python
Stars
7
Forks
36
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

This issue is not open for contribution. Visit Contributing guidelines to learn about the contributing process and how to find suitable issues.

Current behavior

We rolled back separating some common schema definitions (solely a UUID definition) into a separate file because it was not supporting both frontend and backend usage.

Desired behavior

Separate out some common embed definitions, including more than just the previous UUID definition, and structure it similarly to how completion criteria uses mastery criteria, such that we can utilize the schemas on both the frontend and backend.

  • Since le-utils does not have a hard requirement on jsonschema itself, any usage should be overly defensive on it not being installed

Value add

  • DRY

Possible tradeoffs

  • Complexity of separating schema definitions into more than 2 files

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the rolled-back changes in PR #172 and the existing completion-criteria/mastery-criteria structure referenced in the issue. Identify where common embed schemas are defined and how both frontend and backend consumers access them; done means the shared definitions cover more than UUID and remain safe when jsonschema is not installed.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
backend-api-design, tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.