leanprover / leanprover/lean4

`symm` tactic produces term with mvars

Open
#9,997 0 comments 2 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

bug P-medium
Dominant language
Lean
Stars
9.2k
Forks
990
Avg merge
1d 17h
Merged PRs (30d)
175

Description

Description

The symm tactic produces a term containing metavariables when the symmetry lemma has a typeclass assumption.

axiom Foo : Prop
attribute [class] Foo

axiom R : Nat → Nat → Prop
@[symm]
axiom R.symm [Foo] {n m} : R n m → R m n

/- (kernel) declaration has metavariables '_example' -/
example [Foo] {n m} : R n m → R m n := by
  intro; symm; assumption
Versions
Lean 4.24.0-nightly-2025-08-19
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Impact

Add 👍 to issues you consider important. If others are impacted by this issue, please ask them to add 👍 to it.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Reproduce the example using Lean 4.24.0-nightly-2025-08-19 and start by tracing the symm tactic's handling of the [Foo] typeclass assumption. Confirm that the generated declaration no longer contains metavariables, and add a regression test covering this example.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
compilers
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
42/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.