leanprover / leanprover/lean4

Parsing of `ZonedDateTime` is still confusing

Open
#9,025 1 comment 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

bug P-medium
Dominant language
Lean
Stars
9.2k
Forks
990
Avg merge
1d 17h
Merged PRs (30d)
175

Description

Prerequisites

Please put an X between the brackets as you perform the following steps:

Description

Languages like Java have a single function ZonedDateTime.parse which will generally do the right thing for many reasonable things you give it. In Lean, the situation is more compilicated. Prompted by a recent Zulip thread, I played with ZonedDateTime parsing and the experience was suboptimal.

Click here for a live-lean session where you can see me trying to navigate the ZonedDateTime parsing API

Note that the steps that try to access the time zone database fail on live-lean even though they succeed locally.

Expected behavior: The API should make it easy to do the right thing, and hard/impossible to do the wrong thing.

Actual behavior: Everything is about equally difficult right now, both the right things and the wrong things.

Versions

4.22.0-nightly-2025-06-26

Impact

Add 👍 to issues you consider important. If others are impacted by this issue, please ask them to add 👍 to it.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No source file, test file, or entry point is named. Start with the linked live-lean session and its minimal ZonedDateTime parsing example, then inspect the existing parsing API and related time-zone database behavior. Done means the API makes correct parsing straightforward while making incorrect usage difficult or impossible.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
compilers
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.