match elaboration fails to unify definitionally equal types
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Lean
- Stars
- 9.2k
- Forks
- 990
- Avg merge
- 1d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 175
Description
Prerequisites
Please put an X between the brackets as you perform the following steps:
- Check that your issue is not already filed:
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues - Reduce the issue to a minimal, self-contained, reproducible test case.
Avoid dependencies to Mathlib or Batteries. - Test your test case against the latest nightly release, for example on
https://live.lean-lang.org/#project=lean-nightly
(You can also use the settings there to switch to “Lean nightly”)
Description
inductive Mem (a : α) : List α → Type
| head (as : List α) : Mem a (a::as)
| tail (b : α) {as : List α} : Mem a as → Mem a (b::as)
def del : @Mem α a as → List α
| .head as => as
| .tail b mem => b :: del mem
def memOfDel : (mem : Mem c as) → Mem a (del mem) → Mem a as
| .head _, mem => .tail _ mem
| .tail _ mem, .head _ => .head _
| .tail _ mem, .tail _ mem' => .tail _ (memOfDel mem mem')
The above code gives the following error:
type mismatch
Mem.head ?m.1321
has type
Mem ?m.1320 (?m.1320 :: ?m.1321) : Type
but is expected to have type
Mem a (del (Mem.tail ?m.1316 mem)) : Type
However, the definitional equation for the tail case of del should result in the solution ?m.1316 = ?m.1320 = a and ?m.1321 = del mem.
Separating out the second match and adding a type ascription results in an even more inscrutable error:
def memOfDel' : (mem : Mem c as) → Mem a (del mem) → Mem a as
| .head _, mem => .tail _ mem
| .tail b mem, (mem' : Mem a (b :: del mem)) =>
match mem' with
| .head _ => .head _
| .tail _ mem' => .tail _ (memOfDel' mem mem')
type mismatch
mem'
has type
Mem a (b :: del mem) : Type
but is expected to have type
Mem a (del (Mem.tail b mem)) : Type
It is easy to verify that these are definitionally equal:
example : Mem a (b :: del mem) = Mem a (del (Mem.tail b mem)) := rfl
Using .tail (as := _as) b mem in memOfDel' succeeds, but it is not clear from the error message why this is necessary.
Steps to Reproduce
Run the code above.
Expected behavior: The code succeeds with no errors.
Actual behavior: The code gives the errors above.
Versions
Lean 4.16.0-nightly-2025-01-06
Impact
Add 👍 to issues you consider important. If others are impacted by this issue, please ask them to add 👍 to it.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no repository file or test; start by running its minimal self-contained Lean example against the stated nightly version. Investigate match elaboration for memOfDel and its handling of definitionally equal types. The work is complete when both reproductions elaborate successfully and the behavior has regression coverage.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100