RFC: Add CSLib template for lake
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Lean
- Stars
- 9.2k
- Forks
- 990
- Avg merge
- 1d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 175
Description
Proposal
Create a cslib project template in lean. Such a template should create a project with CSLib as the toplevel dependency.
Clear and detailed description of the proposal. Consider the following questions:
-
User Experience: How does this feature improve the user experience?
Allows users to create project using CSLib definitions, and maybe use mathlib's cache and the futurelake cache. -
Beneficiaries: Which Lean users and projects benefit most from this feature/change?
Computer Scientists who wish to use the foundational material being built in CSLib. Currently, those who want to build Free Monad DSLs, or use the formalizations of Labelled-Transition-Systems or typed Lambda Calculi -
Maintainability: Will this change streamline code maintenance or simplify its structure?
Its effect is orthogonal.
Community Feedback
Ideas should be discussed on the Lean Zulip prior to submitting a proposal. Summarize all prior discussions and link them here.
-
The idea came up on Office hours Feb 19th 2026, and was approved by @kim-em
-
Zulip thread here
Impact
Add 👍 to issues you consider important.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the existing discussion in the linked CSLib Zulip thread and the repository's current project-template mechanism. Determine how a template would make CSLib the toplevel dependency and define the expected generated project and cache behavior. Done means the template is available and creates a usable CSLib-based project.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- build-system, developer-experience
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100