Proof-relevant logical equivalences.
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
logic
- Dominant language
- Lean
- Stars
- 709
- Forks
- 200
- Avg merge
- 3d 6h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 45
Description
Logical equivalences should have definitions of concrete proofs first, and then
have accompanying theorems derived through Proposition.equiv.toProp.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start in Cslib/Logics/LinearLogic/CLL/Basic.lean at lines 275-280, and inspect the existing logical equivalences and Proposition.equiv.toProp. Rework the affected equivalences so concrete proof definitions come first and the accompanying theorems are derived through Proposition.equiv.toProp; done means the targeted definitions follow that structure.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100