fix proof to work with backward.isDefEq.respectTransparency
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Lean
- Stars
- 709
- Forks
- 200
- Avg merge
- 3d 6h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 45
Description
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Open Cslib/Computability/Languages/RegularLanguage.lean at line 152 and inspect the proof around the backward.isDefEq.respectTransparency use. Check the surrounding definitions and existing proof conventions, then verify that the proof compiles with the intended transparency behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100