fix proof to work with backward.isDefEq.respectTransparency
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Lean
- Stars
- 709
- Forks
- 200
- Avg merge
- 3d 6h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 45
Description
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Open Cslib/Computability/Languages/OmegaRegularLanguage.lean at line 125 and inspect the proof involving backward.isDefEq.respectTransparency. First reproduce the proof-checking failure with the current Lean environment. Done means the proof elaborates successfully with that API and the file builds.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- devtools
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100