`lbrynet --help` output seems bit incorrect
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 7.2k
- Forks
- 493
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Running lbrynet --help returns following:
$ lbrynet --help
Usage: lbrynet [-v] [--api HOST:PORT] [--audio-encoder AUDIO_ENCODER]
[--config FILE] [--ffmpeg-path FFMPEG_PATH]
[--video-bitrate-maximum VIDEO_BITRATE_MAXIMUM]
[--video-encoder VIDEO_ENCODER] [--video-scaler VIDEO_SCALER]
[--volume-analysis-time VOLUME_ANALYSIS_TIME]
[--volume-filter VOLUME_FILTER]
COMMAND ...
.
.
.
But starting lbrynet following that format, doesn't seem to make options used to take effect.
For example, this doesn't make api listen to port set in command:
lbrynet --api 0.0.0.0:11111 start
(This would work and lbrynet start --help does show the option in its output:
lbrynet start --api 0.0.0.0:11111)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at the lbrynet command entry point and reproduce both command forms shown in the report, comparing how options before and after COMMAND are handled. Done means the documented lbrynet --api HOST:PORT start form applies the API address, or the help output accurately reflects the supported ordering.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- cli
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100