If video is before its channel in a block, it will be considered anonymous in resolve

If a stream claim creation happens before the creation of the channel the claim belongs to, the stream claim won't properly be considered belonging to the channel. (Not 100% sure if this is what happens)

Claim https://odysee.com/koifishresinpour:f on a channel https://odysee.com/@SacredMoonResinArt:6 has "is_channel_signature_valid": true, but following calls don't return it. And canonical_url doesn't include the channel.

lbrynet resolve 'lbry://@SacredMoonResinArt:6/koifishresinpour (gives NOT_FOUND)
lbrynet claim search --claim_ids f3bdb94532facacd18457190f1417cf44cdcc1ea --valid_channel_signature

Claim and channel were created in same block. Maybe transaction that included claim was read before the creation of channel. (If that matters)

Start with the lbrynet resolve and claim search entry points shown in the report, and reproduce the commands for the referenced claim and channel. Trace how a stream claim and its channel are associated when both are created in the same block; done means the channel-qualified resolve succeeds and claim search returns the valid channel signature.