Add support for default license
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 7.2k
- Forks
- 493
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
We will be adding a default content license (draft attached). This license should be made the default if no other license is specified. We should also consider allowing unspecified as a license if specifically suggested.
Either the SDK (or more likely, lbry.com) should also be responsible for storing the canonical license.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the attached LBRY Default Content License draft and tracing how licenses are currently represented and selected. Determine whether the SDK or lbry.com should store the canonical license, then clarify the default and explicitly suggested “unspecified” behavior; done criteria are not defined in the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend, content
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100