larksuite / larksuite/cli

[Feature Request] Expose conditional display and fill-in-blank option settings for base and form commands

Open
#1,041 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

domain/base enhancement
Dominant language
Go
Stars
17.3k
Forks
1.4k
Avg merge
2d 4h
Merged PRs (30d)
105

Description

Two form capabilities native to Lark/Feishu are not exposed by lark-cli base +form commands, making it impossible to automate certain form configurations at scale. This issue requests CLI or API coverage for:

  1. Conditional field display (question visibility rules)
  2. Fill-in-blank after option (inline text input attached to a choice)

Lark Base's form view natively supports conditional display (a field can be set to appear only when a preceding single-select field equals a specific value). The official Lark documentation demonstrates exactly this pattern: a free-text "reason" field that appears only when the user selects a negative option.
Lark Survey also supports a "fill-in-blank after option" mode, where a single-choice or multiple-choice question can have an optional text box attached to one or more options, producing a compact, single-question UX for "select + qualify" scenarios.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by locating the existing lark-cli base +form commands and their form option handling. Compare that implementation with the two capabilities described in the issue and determine whether the required Lark API coverage is available. Done means users can configure conditional field display and fill-in-blank options through the relevant CLI or API commands.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
go
Domain
api, cli
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.