ladybug-tools / ladybug-tools/ladybug

Licensing Ladybug for FreeCAD

Open
#640 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
228
Forks
62
Avg merge
2h 19m
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Description

Hello,
i am discussing use of ladybug with FreeCAD developers. It seems that both Ladybug and FreeCAD are free open-source projects, both trying to maximize usefullnes while protecting freedom of its users by implementing sensible license policy of their respective choices. However there seems to be some incompatibility, so i wanted to open discussion about this topic and find reasonable solution where everyone is happy.

Current state:

I find that kinda funny, because as far as end-user is concerned, the usecase is exactly the same, but outcome is different depending on which way is used to install FreeCAD. Do you think it would be possible to get dual-license or extemption for FreeCAD to re-distribute Ladybug in AppImage? Can you suggest any other way to solve this issue?

Thanks

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the FreeCAD-Bundle pull request #412 and issue #411, along with how FreeCAD installs ladybug-core through a package manager versus an AppImage. The work is complete when the licensing compatibility question has a documented, agreed resolution for FreeCAD redistribution.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
documentation
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.