l3montree-dev / l3montree-dev/devguard

GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf found in golang/google.golang.org/grpc@v1.80.0

Open Beginner friendly
#2,732 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

cvss-severity:high devguard l3montree-cybersecurity/...ard-k8s-image-inventory pkg:oci/devguard-k8s-ima...ch=amd64&tag=main-amd64 pkg:oci/devguard-k8s-ima...ch=arm64&tag=main-arm64 risk:low state:open
Dominant language
Go
Stars
161
Forks
43
Avg merge
1d 8h
Merged PRs (30d)
37

Description

GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf found in golang/google.golang.org/grpc@v1.80.0

[!important]
Risk: 2.30 (Low)
CVSS: 8.8

Description

Multiple security vulnerabilities have been identified and addressed in grpc-go affecting the xDS RBAC authorization engine (internal/xds/rbac) and the HTTP/2 transport server implementation (internal/transport). These vulnerabilities could result in:

  • Authorization Bypass (Fail-Open) when translating xDS RBAC policies containing Metadata or RequestedServerName fields.
  • Denial of Service (High CPU Consumption) due to an HTTP/2 Rapid Reset mitigation bypass during client-initiated stream resets.
  • Denial of Service (Server Panic) when parsing crafted xDS RBAC policies containing NOT rules around unsupported fields.
Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

xDS RBAC Authorization Bypass via Metadata & RequestedServerName matchers
  • Affected Component: xDS RBAC
  • Impact: When building policy matchers for gRPC RBAC from xDS configurations, unsupported permission and principal rules (specifically Metadata and RequestedServerName) were silently ignored and treated as no-ops.
    • If an authorization policy relied purely on these matchers for access control, treating those rules as no-ops effectively removed the restrictions.
  • If these unsupported rules were nested inside logical NOT rules (Permission_NotRule / Principal_NotId) or multi-condition OR/AND rules, silently dropping them changed the boolean logic flow of the authorization engine.

As a result, policy evaluation decisions could fail open, allowing unauthorized clients to access protected gRPC services or resources.

HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Mitigation Bypass / Denial of Service via Stream Aborts
  • Affected Component: HTTP/2 transport
  • Impact: Earlier mitigations in grpc-go for HTTP/2 Rapid Reset only applied threshold checks to items that directly resulted in control frames being written back to the wire, such as SETTINGS ACKs or server-initiated RST_STREAMs.

When a client initiated a rapid flood of stream creation (HEADERS) immediately followed by stream termination RST_STREAM, items queued up in the control buffer without counting against the transport response frame threshold. An attacker can repeatedly trigger this flood sequence to bypass reader blocking, resulting in high CPU usage, and Denial of Service (DoS).

Denial of Service (Panic) in xDS RBAC Engine via Unsupported Fields inside NOT Rules
  • Affected Component: xDS RBAC
  • Impact: The xDS RBAC policy translators recursively generate matchers for nested rules. When a NOT rule wrapped an unsupported or unhandled field (such as SourcedMetadata), the recursive step returned an empty matcher. This could result in a runtime panic when the RBAC engine attempts to authorize an incoming request.

An attacker or misconfigured/malicious xDS management server delivering an LDS/RDS update containing a NOT rule around an unhandled field causes the gRPC server process to crash immediately (CWE-248 / Denial of Service).

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

All three issues have been fixed in master and will be released in 1.82.1 shortly.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

If upgrading grpc-go immediately is not possible, apply the following workarounds based on your deployment architecture:

  • For xDS RBAC Vulnerabilities & Panics: Ensure that upstream xDS management servers do not push RBAC policies containing Metadata, RequestedServerName, or NOT rules wrapping unsupported fields (such as SourcedMetadata) to grpc-go servers.
  • For HTTP/2 Rapid Reset DOS: Configure upstream reverse proxies or load balancers (such as Envoy) with strict HTTP/2 max_concurrent_streams limits and active rate limiting on RST_STREAM frequency per connection.
Severity
Vulnerability Qualitative Severity Approximate CVSS v3.1 Score Primary Impact
xDS RBAC Authorization Bypass High 8.2 Unauthorized Access / Fail-Open
HTTP/2 Rapid Reset DOS Bypass High 7.5 High CPU Consumption / Denial of Service
xDS RBAC Engine Server Panic Medium 5.9 Process Crash / Denial of Service
Affected component

The vulnerability is in pkg:golang/google.golang.org/grpc@v1.80.0, found in artifacts pkg:oci/devguard-k8s-image-inventory?repository_url=ghcr.io/l3montree-dev/devguard-k8s-image-inventory&arch=amd64&tag=main-amd64, pkg:oci/devguard-k8s-image-inventory?repository_url=ghcr.io/l3montree-dev/devguard-k8s-image-inventory&arch=arm64&tag=main-arm64.

Recommended fix

Upgrade to version v1.82.1 or later.

# Update all golang packages
go get -u ./... 
# Update only this package
go get grpc@v1.82.1 
Additional guidance for mitigating vulnerabilities

Visit our guides on devguard.org

See more details...
Path to component
 %%{init: { 'theme':'base', 'themeVariables': {
'primaryColor': '#F3F3F3',
'primaryTextColor': '#0D1117',
'primaryBorderColor': '#999999',
'lineColor': '#999999',
'secondaryColor': '#ffffff',
'tertiaryColor': '#ffffff'
} }}%%
 flowchart TD
Your_application(["Your application"]) --- pkg_golang_google_golang_org_grpc_v1_80_0(["pkg:golang/google.golang.org/grpc\@v1.80.0"])

classDef default stroke-width:2px
Risk Factor Value Description
Vulnerability Depth 1 The vulnerability is in a direct dependency of your project.
EPSS 0.00 % The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
EXPLOIT Not available We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database. There are no script kiddies exploiting this vulnerability.
CVSS-BE 7.9
CVSS-B 8.8 - The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access.
- It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
- An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights.
- No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

More details can be found in DevGuard


Interact with this vulnerability

You can use the following slash commands to interact with this vulnerability:

👍 Reply with this to acknowledge and accept the identified risk.
/accept I accept the risk of this vulnerability, because ...
⚠️ Mark the risk as false positive: Use one of these commands if you believe the reported vulnerability is not actually a valid issue.
/component-not-present The vulnerable component is not included in the artifact.
/vulnerable-code-not-present The component is present, but the vulnerable code is not included or compiled.
/vulnerable-code-not-in-execute-path The vulnerable code exists, but is never executed at runtime.
/vulnerable-code-cannot-be-controlled-by-adversary Built-in protections prevent exploitation of this vulnerability.
/inline-mitigations-already-exist The vulnerable code cannot be controlled or influenced by an attacker.
🔁 Reopen the risk: Use this command to reopen a previously closed or accepted vulnerability.
/reopen ... 

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by locating the Go dependency definition for google.golang.org/grpc and confirm that v1.80.0 is included in the affected artifacts. Update it to v1.82.1 or later, then run the repository's dependency checks or vulnerability scan to verify the reported risk is resolved.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
go
Domain
backend, security
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
68/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.