kworkflow / kworkflow/patch-hub
Improve Test Coverage and Quality Assurance
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 36
- Forks
- 17
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Problem Overview
patch-hub currently has just under 15% test coverage; low test coverage makes it difficult to detect regressions when making changes.
The low test coverage is primarily caused by architectural barriers rendering components difficult to test.
Current State
As of March 15th, patch-hub has less than 15% test coverage. Existing tests focus primarily on utility functions. Core business logic remains largely untested and UI components have minimal test coverage.
Proposed Improvements
- Define what components should be tested and how
- Establish guidelines for writing testable code
- Set coverage targets for different types of code
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the existing utility tests and the largely untested core business logic and UI components, then measure current coverage against the stated under-15% baseline. Define which components need tests, how they should be made testable, and coverage targets; done means the testing scope and guidelines are established with measurable coverage improvements.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100