kubernetes-sigs / kubernetes-sigs/kro
Design and naming review before committing to stable version
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 3k
- Forks
- 373
- Avg merge
- 1d 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 24
Description
Review design decisions and naming of v1alpha features before creating a stable version of KRO. After moving features to a stable version, we must maintain backward compatibility - any changes we want to make should be done before moving features to stable.
Next step: need a doc listing design decisions to review. We can review + approve these decisions just before creating the stable version of KRO.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by identifying the v1alpha design decisions and naming choices that need review; the issue does not name specific files, tests, or entry points. Create the requested design-decision document, then use it to review and approve the choices before KRO moves features to a stable version.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- backend-api-design, release
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100