Architecture diagram marginalia are mixed/mingled
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- SCSS
- Stars
- 19
- Forks
- 117
- Avg merge
- 13h 29m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 13
Description
In continuation of #1114, it appears that the sentence
Operator Infrastructure with a Master Cluster and two dedicated Seed Clusters
which appears in both images, should only be valid for the second.
The first image also suggests there's an independent seed cluster for the User Clusters, which appears wrong. The gray box "Independent of each other" could also combine the area below the "Master Cluster/Seed Cluster" box and the "User-Cluster-1 NS / User-Cluster-2 NS" box. This way "Independent of each other" would mean "sitting in the same Kubernetes cluster" and allowed to understand the two approaches better.
This is especially useful, if future users of the CE need to evaluate how to lay out their infrastructure, esp. in terms of #1120.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read #1114 and compare the first and second architecture images referenced here. Update the diagrams so the quoted Operator Infrastructure sentence appears only in the second, remove the implied independent seed cluster for User Clusters, and clarify the gray “Independent of each other” grouping. Done when the diagrams clearly communicate the two infrastructure approaches for evaluating CE layouts.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- kubernetes
- Domain
- documentation, infrastructure
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100