[discussion] Support Advanced NAS Algorithms
Open
area/katib
area/nas
kind/discussion
kind/question
lifecycle/frozen
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.7k
- Forks
- 542
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Now we are using a custom IR (architecture + nn_config) to represent a candidate model, which may be insufficiently expressive, I think.
I think we should use mature IRs such as Relay IR or ONNX to represent the candidate model.
/cc @DeeperMind @andreyvelich
Contributor guide
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is named. Start by locating the current architecture and nn_config custom IR, then compare its expressiveness with Relay IR and ONNX; done would require an agreed representation and a defined implementation plan for supporting advanced NAS algorithms.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100