C++14 requirement mismatch between README and source code
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 507
- Forks
- 87
- Avg merge
- 15h 27m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
README says:
C++14 backport (e.g., fold expressions not required)
but I noticed use of fold expressions here:
https://github.com/kokkos/mdspan/blob/fef0c8a40e4bd6111eeee36416593504f50cadf3/include/experimental/__p0009_bits/extents.hpp#L61-L63
there may be more (I haven't checked).
Should the use of fold expressions be removed? Or will C++14 support require some C++17 language features?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Compare the C++14 claim in README with the fold-expression use in include/experimental/__p0009_bits/extents.hpp at lines 61–63. Search for other C++17 language features, then establish whether the documentation or source is authoritative; done means the stated requirement and implementation agree and the relevant checks pass.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 28/100