koala73 / koala73/worldmonitor
discovery(correlation): evaluate decay-weighted causal chains
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 86.6k
- Forks
- 13.1k
- Avg merge
- 8h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 825
Description
## Related epic
#5981 — discovery only; this issue does not block epic completion.
## What to build
Determine whether entity-keyed, time-decayed causal chains produce a trustworthy user-facing escalation view worth adding to the correlation product.
## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] Name the user problem, target surface, baseline, primary outcome, minimum acceptable result, and opportunity cost.
- [ ] Define allowed causal edge types, provenance, confidence semantics, temporal replay, and weakest-link behavior.
- [ ] Validate that Redis adjacency storage is sufficient and specify retention, invalidation, and recovery behavior.
- [ ] Test representative sanction-to-disruption-to-market chains and explicit non-causal negatives.
- [ ] Define the user-visible states for incomplete, disputed, stale, and unsupported chains.
- [ ] Produce an explicit promote, defer, or reject decision and require fresh implementation review before coding.
## Blocked by
- #5987
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reading blocked issue #5987 and the related discovery epic #5981. Evaluate the stated causal-chain, Redis storage, replay, negative-case, and user-state criteria, then document a promote, defer, or reject decision with implementation review required before coding.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- redis, typescript
- Domain
- backend-api-design, databases
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100