Better way to select randomExhaustive() stochastic values
Open
enhancement
good first issue
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Input a list?
If list isn't long enough take values over and guess the rest
If all else fails go with default values
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by locating the randomExhaustive() implementation in the Python framework and read how stochastic values are currently selected. The issue proposes accepting a list, reusing values when it is short, guessing remaining values, and falling back to defaults; confirm these rules before defining what done means. No specific file or test is named.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100