thalamic segmentation out of date
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 7
- Forks
- 6
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
The current segmentation approach https://freesurfer.net/fswiki/ThalamicNuclei seems to have been superceded by a couple other approaches:
https://freesurfer.net/fswiki/ThalamicNucleiDTI
including a Bayesian one and a CNN..
I am thinking it may be useful to swap in the CNN version (likely the most computationally efficient option)..
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
No implementation file, test, or entry point is named in the issue. Start by comparing the current ThalamicNuclei approach with the linked ThalamicNucleiDTI documentation and its Bayesian and CNN alternatives. Done would mean selecting an approach and integrating it into scattr with a way to verify the resulting segmentation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100