Pandora sometimes misses obvious-looking track cluster associations
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 21
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
`PandoraPFOs` (clusters + associated tracks)
`PandoraPFOs` + all `SiTracks`
TODO:
- [ ] Check if this looks the same for `SiTracks_Refitted`
json and podio-dump output for the event
[pi+.10000.REC.edm4hep.json](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/16246366/pi%2B.10000.REC.edm4hep.json)
[pi+.10000.REC.dump.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/16246367/pi%2B.10000.REC.dump.txt)
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the attached pi+.10000.REC.edm4hep.json and pi+.10000.REC.dump.txt, comparing the PandoraPFOs associations with the SiTracks collection. Check whether the same behavior occurs for SiTracks_Refitted; done means the missed association is reproduced and its cause or required correction is documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100