Tree Commits History: improve performance
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Backend
Queries
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 9
- Forks
- 31
- Avg merge
- 3d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 16
Description
Description
We’ve observed that the commit history endpoint can occasionally take several seconds to respond. To ensure a smooth navigation experience, we should aim to optimize this latency. Reducing this overhead will significantly improve the perceived loading times of the UI during transitions.
Success Criteria
Latency: The status-history endpoint must consistently return in <1s under standard load.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at the commit-history status-history endpoint and trace the request path that produces the tree commit history. Measure its latency under standard load, identify the main overhead, and verify that the endpoint consistently responds in under 1 second after the change.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- api, backend, performance
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100