Software license review ref
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 86
- Forks
- 25
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I'm not sure if this fits, but (Morin and Urban 2012) is a very good review of software licenses for scientists. It might fit in the 2nd paragraph of the _Introduction_ or in _Use Cases: 8. Lowering barriers to reuse_.
Morin A, Urban J, Sliz P (2012) A Quick Guide to Software Licensing for the Scientist-Programmer. PLoS Computational Biology 8: e1002598. Available:http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002598
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Review the paper citation in the issue and locate the manuscript's Introduction and “Use Cases: 8. Lowering barriers to reuse” sections. Decide which section best fits the software-licensing reference, add the citation there, and verify that the manuscript's reference formatting remains consistent.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100